On the Algebraic Immunity - Resiliency trade-off, implications for Goldreich's Pseudorandom Generator
Leo: A Programming Language for Formally Verified, Zero-Knowledge Applications
Smooth Zero-Knowledge Hash Functions
Non-Interactive, Secure Verifiable Aggregation for Decentralized, Privacy-Preserving Learning
Locally Reconstructable Non-malleable Secret Sharing
PipeZK: Accelerating Zero-Knowledge Proof with a Pipelined Architecture
A Permissionless Proof-of-Stake Blockchain with Best-Possible Unpredictability
Verifying Post-Quantum Signatures in 8 kB of RAM
A Trustless GQ Multi-Signature Scheme with Identifiable Abort
AOT: Anonymization by Oblivious Transfer
zkCNN: Zero Knowledge Proofs for Convolutional Neural Network Predictions and Accuracy
Generalized Galbraith's Test: Characterization and Applications to Anonymous IBE Schemes
Efficient Attribute Based Encryption for Boolean Circuits
Batching Base Oblivious Transfers
https://sites.google.com/site/ctrsa2021/conference-program
https://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2021/program.html
| Posts & Videos |
|---|
| 道之力:我是如何不再担心并爱上可信设置的 |
| The Limits to Blockchain Scalability |
| What everyone gets wrong about 51% attacks |
| Constant-Time Big Numbers: An Introduction |
| Mike Rosulek教授开讲不经意传输及其扩展 |
| Introducing GTC – Gitcoin’s Governance Token |
| A few lessons from the history of multiparty computation |
| Mathematicians Find Long-Sought Building Blocks for Special Polynomials |
| Blockchain voting is overrated among uninformed people but underrated among informed people |
| How Inevitable Is the Concept of Numbers? |
| Secret-shared Shuffle—秘密共享下的洗牌协议 |
| 希尔伯特计划是如何被哥德尔与图灵“打脸”的? |
| Panel:如何建设更好的 Layer2 |
| 为什么「桥」对 Layer 2 很重要? |
| 我们正从创造 NFT 转为使用 NFT,这五个领域充满机遇 |
| 随机数在区块链中的应用 |
| IEEE S&P 2021 参会小记---5月25日论文报告 |
| IEEE S&P 2021 参会小记---5月24日论文报告 |
| zkSync 1.x: Swaps, NFTs, event system, and permissionless token listing |
| Quantum computers could crack today's encrypted messages. That's a problem |
| In which I answer more quantum computing questions |
“撒谎对自己有利的时候,为什么要说实话?”
罗素转向哲学,是希望在之前只有怀疑的地方找到确定性,而维特根斯坦,则是上述那种问题激起的强制倾向把他拽进了哲学。可以说,是哲学找的他,而非他找的哲学。在他的体验里,那个问题的两难是讨厌的侵扰和费解的谜,强加于他、俘虏了他,令他不能好好过日常生活,除非哪天能用一个满意的解答将其驱除。
--《维特根斯坦传:天才之为责任》

往期周刊回顾:
为了方便电脑用户,以及更开放的互联网访问,周刊内容会同步发布在Gitbook。
点击【阅读原文】👇可访问